You’re, not your. USA is a political entity, not a concept so it’s a very poor analogy. Capitalism did not invent the idea of getting paid for work, and feudalism wasn’t the only system that preceded it, please educate yourself. This is almost as embarrassing as the belief that we supposedly can’t say “yes, what one would call X today, did exist at Y point in time in the past.” You are right about one thing though, I’ve got better things to do than replying further so bye lol

1. Yes, it was your pedantic nature that started this thing, so of course you would think a typo is a sign of your superiority.

2. Political entities *are* concepts. 

3. Again, you do the thing where you just say I’m wrong, and then do nothing to rebut my claims, so I can’t actually reply to you. 

4. The reason I recommended you read Kripke’s book “Naming and Necessity” is precisely because his argument, and one that I agree with, is that when it comes to names and natural kinds, you actually *can’t* say “What one would call X today, did exist at Y point in time in the past.“ This is because both names, and terms for natural kinds, obey a very particular set of linguistic rules–to sum up his argument rather quickly, the serve as rudimentary markers, but don’t carry any semantic content of their own. I didn’t go any further into that argument, because if this conversation was this difficult for you, trying to have an actual conversation about theories of names and philosophy of langauge would have been disastrous to your self-esteem.

5. Bye! Thanks for reading my stories at least! Unless you’re just a random troll! It’s been…well, not exactly fun, but an interesting exercise.

btw I’m not assuming that language is static and unchanging, that’s why I said “commonly accepted as standard today”, you on the other hand seem to think that just because what words mean is defined by the people then they don’t really mean anything at all and you may use them as you please, but that’s not really the case.

Your using a word’s meaning as it’s commonly accepted today, and then trying to apply it throughout all of human history. That’s the problem I’m pointing out. I’m saying that even though we have the word “job” currently, that doesn’t mean you can then look back through all of history, and start calling things “jobs” just because they’re similar.

This is like saying that “The United States” existed a millennia ago. Technically, all of the land that is currently “The United States” exists both now, and back in the year 1017, but the social reality of the country did not exist then. If you went back in tine, and told someone that you were standing in the United States, you would be wrong. Jobs did not exist until capitalism created the economic mechanisms and structures that allowed jobs to exist.

So, when I said you’re assuming language is static and unchanging, you’re right, that was a mischaracterization of your view, and I’ll be more precise. Your problem is one of objectivity. You’re assuming that your current linguistic frame of reference is absolute, that the current form of the English Language is somehow capable of adequately describing everything not only within it’s current time frame, but also within the context of every other time frame. Still, that’s not how language works, but is a great example of Capitalistic reification, to assume that our current economic system isn’t just absolute, but capable of being applied backwards onto every single other form of human life that has already existed. That simply isn’t the case, but it’s an easy form of alienation to find yourself caught up in.

There are more economic systems than feudalism, capitalism and communism. Your understanding of these is very flawed and simplistic. If not your rude and combative tone I might have tried to rectify some of it but I don’t get the impression that you are interested in learning anything. It’s unfortunate that some of your followers will now read things like “Getting paid wages for work is literally what Capitalism is” and probably believe that’s the definition lol

I mean, you *say* you have shit to back this up with, but you aren’t *giving* me anything. You need some receipts here. 

Still, if I’ve offended you, you’re welcome to back off already. You *must* have better things to do than keep arguing with some internet porn author, right? Surely there’s someone else in your life you can talk to who respects your intellectual rigor and sensitivity, instead of wasting more time with me.

You must.

Or else why would you keep putting these in my inbox?

I couldn’t imagine go through all the trouble of being an author of any degree of success, devoted *specifically* to a niche audience, and recieving fan-mail beginning with the ‘word’ “lol.” I congratulate you on whatever skill or ability allows you to ignore that transgression, as well as calmly replying to the rest of that particular subject matter.

I waste four years of my life getting a degree in philosophy with a minor in political science, with a particular emphasis in propaganda and political language, and you think I would waste an opportunity to absolutely own someone on the internets with it? 

What the fuck else is it ever going to be good for? Money? Pssshhhh. 

The definition I use is the one that’s commonly accepted as standard today. Capitalism didn’t invent the concept of getting paid for work. If we are talking about definitions, you aren’t using labor in a very accurate way either. Consider giving Marx a read, you might find out that he actually intended workers to have jobs (but probably not if you redefine the term to something like “mephistophelian scheme to suck the life force out of people”)

Getting paid wages for work is literally what Capitalism is. That’s the entire point. When we talk about economic systems before Capitalism, we are discussing economic systems where this economic relation did not exist yet. Feudalism, for example, the economic system directly preceding Capitalism, was the exchange of land rights for work–wealthy lords allowed people to live on their land, in exchange for one’s labor. That might bear a passing resemblance to a job as we commonly use the term, but it isn’t the same economic relation, not by a long shot. You are using relatively new terms of language and trying to make them apply to eras when they didn’t even exist yet. 

As far as the term labor, you say I’m not using it accurately, but you didn’t offer any actual counter argument…so…whatever. 

As for Marx intending people to have jobs…???What???

For one thing, throughout his writings, Marx never adequately described what, exactly, Communism would look like (I say that as someone who has read a substantial number of his works). One thing that would not have existed in Communism, however, is any form of relation which would resemble the employer/employee relation which is fundamental to capitalism, so…no. People would do work, and labor would exist, of course, but the economic relations of a Communist society would be fundamentally classless–there would be no “employers”, and so there would be no one offering “jobs” at all, or at least, not jobs in the sense that we understand them now.

In the end, you’re making still making the same fallacious linguistic argument–you’re assuming that language is static and unchanging, and that just because something appears similar to a natural kind we currently use, that means it must be an instance of that natural kind, but that isn’t how language works, that isn’t how natural kinds function logically, and that isn’t how reality is socially constructed. Go read Saul Kripke’s book, “On Naming and Necessity,” and then get back to me when you’re done with being a corncob.

Idolized (Part 5)

Toby licked his lips, eyeing the drooling green cock a couple of feet from his face, smelling the musk rolling over him. He looked over at the Professor Jeral, likely lost before he could get here, and wondered what he should be feeling. He was…brilliant, and yet watching him slobber all over the chief’s skin, seeing him lose himself in the pleasure of the tribe…Toby found himself longing for it. “No–No, I…but I–” he stammered, but he found himself losing the words even as he spoke them. Kal’Ragek didn’t need words, the lord demanded action. He knelt lower, kissing the chief’s feet, licking the dust from them, tasting them, and worked his way higher until the chief–his chief–allowed him to suck at his cock, and taste him again. Kal’Ragek could forgive, and Toby–he desired forgiveness more than anything else.

An hour later, the three of them returned to the tribe, and were welcomed back into the fold. Professor Jeral was presented to Kal’Ragek, and he immediately fell to his knees, ass high, ready to be brought into the tribe. Other men were there as well–more men than Toby recalled there being when he’d left earlier. They were…being drawn here. Kal’ragek was powerful enough now to pull them in, to begin rebuilding what he had lost.

“Go, brother. Bring him in. Give yourself to our Lord and prove you are not an enemy, accept your name, and your place at my side.”

Toby stepped forward, running his hands over his professor’s ass, feeling how smooth his skin was–remembering how smooth his own skin had been, the old man flinching for a moment, and then relaxing. Toby stroked his cock until it was fully erect, nearly ten inches with a thick foreskin even larger than the chiefs, his balls aching below. Kal’Ragek was present–around him, and within him, as he slid his cock in his professor’s hole, listening to him groan with pleasure, Toby’s eyes locked on the glowing idol before him. Why had he been so afraid, before? There was no room for fear here–this was only room for power.

He felt his body swelling, the clothes he’d thown on tearing to bits within seconds, as his bones shifted and cracked. He’d grown substantially before this, but he recalled how Darren had exploded in size when he’d taken his new name–was he ready for this? Was he ready to give up everything he’d been? He gripped Jeral’s hips tight and thrust harder, both of them panting and groaning in unison, the tribe around them staring in rapture. He had to keep shifting position as he grew taller and broader, his face aching–his new face. His brow was thickening, his nose wider, the thick beard he’d sprouted over the past days growing longer until it hung below his chest, the hair on his head lengthening as well and turning a deep, oily black and lastly his teeth. He gritted them, feeling them sharpen, cutting into his gums, his incisors growing faster as his jaw widened, pressing out from his his mouth into tusks, wet with slobber and blood.

Kal’Ragek was there, inside him, and nothing else was anymore. The fear was gone, the knowledge of that old world fading faster, and he allowed it to go. They would create a new world now, like he had been created anew. His name was To’Rak, of the highest clan, second to the chief. He would never fear again, so long as the light of Kal’Ragek shone within him–may it never be doused for a thousand years.


A week after Darren first discovered the idol of Kal’Ragek, the campsite near the excavation site was empty. A crew of workers arrived to deliver a load of food and supplies, only to discover every tent was empty–it was like everyone had simply disappeared overnight. The excavation site was another mystery. It too was abandoned, but it looked like it had been ransacked at some point. Items had been taken seemingly at random, both from the storage and preservation areas, and also from within the ground. New holes had been dug, seemingly at random, and several objects of great size had been hauled from the ground and dragged away–but the trail ended at the edge of some woods.

The country buried the event, but the various explanations offered–everything from an attack by wild animals to mysterious kidnapping by a rogue terrorist organization–failed to satisfy the families of the men who had disappeared. The few women who had been at the dig site, however, appeared a couple of weeks later, unharmed, but with no memories at all of what had happened at the site, aside from a few wild tales of sex, and an eerie green light. In time, people stopped paying attention, as they do, and the mysterious disappearance was forgotten. The excavation site became the property of the military, but nothing of any worth was found, because the tribe had already reclaimed everything that mattered.

Kal’Ragek did not desire the world–a few scores of men worshipping him was more than enough to keep him satisfied. The tribe lived in the wilderness, and within six months they had all been granted new names, and with them, had lost all memory of the worlds they had come from. Darr’Rak, with To’Rak at his side, were capable leaders. The tribe prospered and flourished as it had all those centuries ago. It was the twelfth such tribe that had existed–but Kal’Ragek believed this one would last a long time.

The legend of the disappearance would lead the occasional group to go out and search for evidence of what had happened to the men working on the excavation. Generally, these attempts were short lived. The military would generally see them coming, and detain the searchers for a few days, long enough to discourage them from continuing their pursuit, but on occasion, some particularly dedicated parties would delve deeper–through the thick woods where the drag marks had stopped, to the mountainous foothills beyond. It was an inhospitable place, generally, but it took hard times to make the greatest tribes.

The search parties might catch the occasional scent on the wind. Something none of them had ever smelled before. At night, there would be the occasional green glow behind the lower foothills, and the men would find themselves drawn deeper into the mountains, while the women, unnerved, would flee. By the time they found the tribe, Kal’Ragek would have been in their minds for days, softening and preparing them. Below, in the middle of the tribal camp, would be the idols, and the orcs would gather to accept the newest members of the tribe as they came down into the valley and bowed to their new lord, presenting their holes for their new brothers.

Of course, a few dodged that fate and managed to make it back to their civilizations. No one believed them, of course. Their dreams were haunted all the same–filled with the green of the idol, that distant voice they could barely hear, and a deep, bone shaking sense of regret. They all returned, eventually, and were taken in as equals. Kal’Ragek always forgives, after all, unless you are an enemy, but why be an enemy when you can join the tribe?

lol jobs aren’t a construct of capitalism, they very much have existed before capitalism and still exist within the frameworks of other economic systems

*Labor* has existed in every economic system, both in capitalism and in earlier times, but the concept of a “job”–that is, a form of labor mediated by an employer/employee relationship–didn’t exist prior to the rise of capital. 

A lot of this just depends on how broad of a definition of the word we want to use–if you mean it broadly, that is, having a job is doing any form of labor at all, then yes, of course you’re right. I don’t think that’s a good definition (after all, I don’t think people would consider slave labor to be a “job”) but I also assume that isn’t the meaning you meant. On the other hand, you can define the term so narrowly that it becomes circular, and I wouldn’t want that either.

So let me meet you halfway. In previous economic systems, people had things that we would describe as jobs, sure. But, I would argue in reply, that the relationship those people had between their labor, their “employer” and the economic structures of the time, were vastly different than our own, and so, not really at all comparable to our general use of the term job. 

In fact, if you look at the etymology of the term, it’s actually fairly young: (http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?term=job). The first use only dates back to the 1600′s, which is after the last major economic system, Feaudalism, is generally considered to have ended. Even then, it wasn’t used as we use it now–it simply meant “a task” or “a thing that needed to be done.” It took on the meaning of “work for pay” around 1650, and didn’t mean a “paid position” until the mid 1800′s, that is, well within the Capitalist Era. The much older word, which would have been used in the Feudal Era was simply work, and it’s earlier etymologies, since the term ‘job’ didn’t yet exist.

In any case, “jobs” very much are a construct of the dominant capitalist system, regardless of whether something like a job existed in prior economic systems. It’s an aspect of alienation, a way of disguising the relationship a worker has with their own labor–and the means of production. 

tl;dr – Economic and social oppression doesn’t really give a fuck about semantics. It’s still there whether you want to argue like a pedant or not.

If you could have any job in the world, what would it be? Writing?

I think jobs are constructs of capitalism, so I’d rather jobs not exist, if we’re talking utopia.

As for what kind of labor I enjoy, yeah, writing is up there, but I think that if I had to write all the time, no matter what I was writing, I would go a bit more insane than I already am. I have to be doing something with my hands too, actually making something. I very much enjoyed baking while I did it, and if I didn’t have to worry about the sorry living, I wouldn’t mind doing that again, perhaps. 

I don’t know, jobs are a lot like kinks–you can convince yourself you like something if you try it enough times, even if you know you shouldn’t. 

I guess this is a multi-part question. Are you in a long-term relationship with anybody, and if you are, how much do they know about the stuff you write? Are they interested in it as well, or do they just accept it as a part of you? Did you specifically look for somebody who had similar turn-ons?

Yes, I’ve been with my husband for close to ten years now, and married for around eight. He knows about the stuff I write, but is not particularly interested or turned on by it, but it doesn’t bother him that I write it. Our kinks are very different, but, the relationship works for us. I wasn’t looking for someone to match my kinks with by any means. 

It’s a bit of a struggle, I suppose, trying to figure out how to balance the sexual and the romantic. I had a very, very awful experience with a dom who was extremely abusive, which really put me off from pursuing real life kink experiences for many years, and for a lot of other reasons, sex has always been difficult for me. It’s only been in the last couple of years, that I’ve been able to step out a bit and expand myself sexually, both with him and others, after we both felt comfortable opening up our relationship.